Gimme a break!!
Parabeaglex2
270 Posts
Okay, now I've seen it all... in beautiful Salem, Oregon (motto: We're a couple hundred square miles surrounded by reality), a local high school student wanted to post a picture of her older brother, a Marine serving in Iraq, as part of a school project highlighting former graduates at work. The principal would not post the photograph because the Marine in question was holding a (gasp!) ASSAULT RIFLE!! Apparently this ran contrary to the school's zero tolerance policy on weapons (apparently it also applied to pictures of weapons). Nothing, of course, was said about the school mascot, who wields a sword in his picture.
Helloooo! Anybody there? THE GUY'S A MARINE IN A COMBAT ZONE! OF COURSE HE'S HOLDING A GUN!
Sometimes I think this country is getting too PC for its own good!
Helloooo! Anybody there? THE GUY'S A MARINE IN A COMBAT ZONE! OF COURSE HE'S HOLDING A GUN!
Sometimes I think this country is getting too PC for its own good!
Comments
There's a 'Salute to Veterans' board in all Wal-Marts (I believe in all of them). Many of the photos are military people with weapons. To my knowledge, no one has ever looked at one of those pictures and felt inclined to go in and shoot up anybody.
What's PC?
Latest is that first the principal backpedaled a bit when the community got up in arms about her refusal to post the pic. The principal offered to post a version in which the gun had been "airbrushed out." The family refused.
When a reporter confronted the principal about the fact their school mascot holds a sword her reply was "So he does... maybe we'll have to revisit that."
I think this woman is a couple sandwiches short of a picnic.xflash
Argggh, I am going to stop now - she doesn't care about her own graduates, let alone my son or all the other son's and daughters putting it all on the line.