Differentian in vacation accumulation for employees
CarmenSuterTN
3 Posts
We have recently hired a Plant Engineer who has the title "VP Of Engineering". We gave this person 4 weeks vacation up front, which is the maximum that you may accrue. We have also hired a person in a supervisory position as well who has to follow the accrual rate which is stated in our handbook. (Two weeks per year for the first 5 years). Both of these persons are of the same exempt status. However, the plant engineer is paid on what is called the executive payroll which is ran monthly.
Something about this practice bothers me. Should we not be giving all exempt employees 4 weeks and not just higher level employees? Have we set a precedent? Have we been discriminatory? Is this something that should even be given discretion to? This was a decision made by the owner of our company and was not ran through the HR channel when this employee was hired.
Something about this practice bothers me. Should we not be giving all exempt employees 4 weeks and not just higher level employees? Have we set a precedent? Have we been discriminatory? Is this something that should even be given discretion to? This was a decision made by the owner of our company and was not ran through the HR channel when this employee was hired.
Comments
It is perfectly legal to grant different benefits to different classes of employees - not just exempt vs nonexempt - but within those classifications. You can make classifications for executives, management, part time, etc. However, within those classes you need to treat all employees equitably.
You may have set a precedent regarding what vacation you grant to executives vs supervisors, but I don't see any problem with that.
Hope this was helpful.
Should we give an option of negotiating more vacation time in for other new managerial employees? I feel as though they deserve as much time off as any other person in management. Maybe that's where I'm uncomfortable with this practice.
Here is another example of what concerns me:
A few years ago, we promoted a male QA supervisor to the plant manager and gave him the difference of what would make 4 weeks vacation as part of his promotion. Again this was not ran past HR. Then last year the HR VP retired and one of the HR managers took over his responsibilites. She was not given the title or the offer to make up the difference of 4 weeks vacation. However, she is doing the duties.
Thank you all so much. Just when I feel that I know so much, I come up against something that I can analyze to death and not have an answer on my own.
As far as your last question goes, remember to compare apples to apples - and it sounds like you may be trying to compare apples to oranges, which doesn't work. When it comes to the management hierarchy, there are many different scenarios that wouldn't necessarily result in the same outcomes for 2 different managers. Unless a plant manager is on the same hierarchical level as a VP of HR, I don't think you should sweat it.
It also sounds like it may be time for upper management to be reminded of how important it is to run things past HR before they happen, just for the sake of a legal CYA...good luck - that's never a fun conversation!
Just don't tell the employees they can't talk with each other about how much vacation time they get. ;-)