New to FMLA, please help
ltackett
1 Post
Employee has been off work a day here, two days there, etc. for the past 6 weeks due to what has finally been diagnosed as an aneurysm. When an employee calls in sick how can you designate it as FMLA? She has missed several days in these 6 weeks and I am sure is looking at surgery. Should we have done something during these past weeks to classify any of those days as counting toward FMLA? I'm guessing we cannot go back now and say those were FMLA days, right? Can we only call it FMLA if she misses 3 consecutive days? What if the next week she only misses 1 day?
Comments
See Sec. 825.301 (http://www.dol.gov/federalregister/HtmlDisplay.aspx?DocId=21763&Month=11&Year=2008)
"If an employer does not designate leave as required by Sec. 825.300, the employer may retroactively designate leave as FMLA leave with appropriate notice to the employee
as required by Sec. 825.300 provided that the employer's failure to timely designate leave does not cause harm or injury to the employee.
In all cases where leave would qualify for FMLA protections, an employer and an employee can mutually agree that leave be retroactively designated as FMLA leave."
Your other question is answered at http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/esa/title_29/part_825/29CFR825.203.htm
"Eligible employees may take FMLA leave on an intermittent or
reduced schedule basis when medically necessary due to the serious
health condition of a covered family member or the employee or the
serious injury or illness of a covered servicemember. See Sec.
825.202. Eligible employees may also take FMLA leave on an intermittent
or reduced schedule basis when necessary because of a qualifying
exigency. If an employee needs leave intermittently or on a reduced
leave schedule for planned medical treatment, then the employee must
make a reasonable effort to schedule the treatment so as not to disrupt
unduly the employer's operations.
[73 FR 68088, Nov. 17, 2008]"
The new FMLA regulations have an example of what could be considered "harm" and another for what wouldn't. http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/esa/title_29/part_825/29CFR825.301.htm (see part e)
"For example, if an employer that was
put on notice that an employee needed FMLA leave failed to designate
the leave properly, but the employee's own serious health condition
prevented him or her from returning to work during that time period
regardless of the designation, an employee may not be able to show that
the employee suffered harm as a result of the employer's actions.
However, if an employee took leave to provide care for a son or
daughter with a serious health condition believing it would not count
toward his or her FMLA entitlement, and the employee planned to later
use that FMLA leave to provide care for a spouse who would need
assistance when recovering from surgery planned for a later date, the
employee may be able to show that harm has occurred as a result of the
employer's failure to designate properly. The employee might establish
this by showing that he or she would have arranged for an alternative
caregiver for the seriously-ill son or daughter if the leave had been
designated timely."
This defintiely looks like something you should discuss with your attorney before taking any action.