GINA backdoor to ADAAA?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bae5/8bae5d84c6e2410cbb440d5161bbad79785265c7" alt="NaeNae55"
If GINA can be a basis for a discrimination case for baldness, does it follow that having genetically bad eyes will let you sue even though ADAAA specifically excluded it?
[url]http://www.delawareemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/do_bald_employees_finally_have.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+delawareemploymentlawblog/UagR+(Delaware+Employment+Law+Blog)[/url]
[url]http://www.delawareemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/do_bald_employees_finally_have.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+delawareemploymentlawblog/UagR+(Delaware+Employment+Law+Blog)[/url]