Grammatically speaking . . .
System
5,885 Posts
When using contractions, we say "aren't you?" for "are you not." We say "isn't he?" for "is he not?" So why isn't it (is it not?) "am't I?" for "am I not?" Why do we say "aren't I?"
I'm (I am) right about this, am't I?
I'm (I am) right about this, am't I?
Comments
[b]Contraction[/b]
aren't [i]colloquial in all senses[/i]
[b]Are not.[/b]
Am not (used only in the question aren't I? = am I not?).
So you're correct!
I think it is so the black olives are not exposed to light.
Will somebody please tell the lady from AZ that ya'll is y'all.
My post was generated as a result of a conversation with a grammatically correct person who said "aren't I?" I never say that. And I never say 'irregardless.'
And Don, Sam just needed a break from polishing all those shoes she owns.
>11-03-04 AT 06:13 AM (CST)[/font]
>
>Irregardless that people often say
>'irregardless' when they mean regardless,
>irregardless is not a word. Even I know that.
>Aren't I smart?
>
>And Don, Sam just needed a break from polishing
>all those shoes she owns.
I agree; unfortunately,it is in the new dictionaries.
But, back to the subject. Who would need to ask Aren't I? If you ARE, you would KNOW and would not have to ask. Id'n that right? And if you were or wuz to ask, shouldn't you ask AM I instead of aren't I? e.g. "Am I supposed to meet you in room 206 at 8:00 p.m.?" Rather than "Aren't I ...?"
I have a file of Ray's Bloopers and he has used irregardless no less than three times in Forum conversations.