References
SDDCHR
192 Posts
It's unfortunate that we have come to a point, due to litigation, where we can't even get a reference on a perspective employee from a previous employer. For the most part, all that we can get is confirmed dates of employment. Other then indentified work history on the application, we really have no way of knowing what type of applicant we are truely getting. Is this a commonality throughout? Has anyone ever run into a defamation suit by giving out an "objective" reference? I guess it comes down to the "Intuition" that Paul was talking about in a previous post.
Comments
For example, when I received a call from Detective So&so of the Phoenix Police Department, requesting information about a previous employee who wanted to be a police officer, I called the department back, verified the caller's name and occupation, then proceeded to give the info he needed.
Although I have not received any defamation suits, I certainly don't want for my company to be the first. My question to you and other Forumites, have any of you used a "screening" company and got expanded references?
Because I live and work in a small community, I know a lot of HR/hiring people personally. If I happen to run into them at the grocery store, what's the problem with having a little chat? I have dodged the bullet several times with this more informal approach.
Anne in Ohio
One tardy notice in a file doesn't mean the employee has a lateness problem. You have to consider length of service, circumstances, supervisor issues, etc.
I tell our employees up front, do a good job and you will get a good reference. Its only right.
We had an informal code that we used among each other for reference checks - if we heard that the former employer had a "fat file" on the employee, that was our clue not to hire!