Not Eligible for FMLA...
FunHRBanker
562 Posts
This situation was presented by someone in another HR group I belong to. I told her that I thought allowing the leave would set a precedent. If it were an upper level employee with ourstanding skills, she may allow it, but an entry level position I'd be leary of starting this. If the employee has exhausted her paid leave and doesn't qualify for FMLA, I think they're safe to term. What do you say?
Employee was hired 2/4/08 as a full time teller. She never said she had any problems that would effect her attendance.
On 2/14/08 she went to the doctor. Since then she has been excessively absent to go to the doctor. She had cancer that had been in remission and they thought it was back.
She requested a part time schedule that would allow for her to be off more but we did not have any part time positions for her and that is what I explained to her. I explained that she had no FMLA and that if her absences continued to be excessive, it would probably be better is she resigned and reapplied later, when she was able to work full time.
Now she has found that she will need surgery in June and will be off 3-4 weeks. I know that she is sick but is it right to allow her to be off with no time?
Employee was hired 2/4/08 as a full time teller. She never said she had any problems that would effect her attendance.
On 2/14/08 she went to the doctor. Since then she has been excessively absent to go to the doctor. She had cancer that had been in remission and they thought it was back.
She requested a part time schedule that would allow for her to be off more but we did not have any part time positions for her and that is what I explained to her. I explained that she had no FMLA and that if her absences continued to be excessive, it would probably be better is she resigned and reapplied later, when she was able to work full time.
Now she has found that she will need surgery in June and will be off 3-4 weeks. I know that she is sick but is it right to allow her to be off with no time?
Comments
joannie
I would recommend that you advise your colleague to engage in more discussion with this person to determine what, exactly, the condition is, how long it is expected to last, etc. before making any determination regarding termination.
Good luck!
Good luck!
Nae
Cancer treatment is covered under ADA if I'm understanding Linda correctly.
At this point I would engage in a detailed discussion with the EE regarding what the condition is, how long it is expected to last, how long they need off, what you have done in the past for other EEs in similar situations, etc. Make sure everything is in writing and verified through the treating physician. Then, before making any final decisions, discuss it with your labor attorney to be certain you have covered all the bases.
There have been numerous cases here in WI where an EE had some type of condition, not covered under ADA but was found to be covered under the WFEA and the employer ended up in hot water for their actions.
Be careful!!!
Thanks!!
We have had individuals with cancer and you would never know it....they take their treatments and go on with their lives and live as normally as possible. Depending on the severity of the disease, treatments, surgery, etc. this may not apply to everyone.
In the case of ADA, this can be very tricky and I would get your labor counsel involved, especially if the physician states that she can perform the essential functions of the position and you don't feel she can.