Actually that is not EXACTLY correct. In the FMLA regulations it states that cosmetic surgery, unless complications develop, are NOT serious health conditions under FMLA. The question here is really how far to go with it.
Believe me, breast reduction surgery is not always cosmetic.
Since the employer is not supposed to know a diagnosis, it would seem to me that if the doctor certifies the procedure as a serious health condition then it would be covered under FMLA--cosmetic or not. Wouldn't that be up to the doctor to make the determination?
I know the statue says cosmetic is not covered. But if the doctor indicates that it qualifies I have to assume it does. My boss however does not. Ergo the question. Thanks to all who posted. I appreciate the help.
Comments
Since the employer is not supposed to know a diagnosis, it would seem to me that if the doctor certifies the procedure as a serious health condition then it would be covered under FMLA--cosmetic or not. Wouldn't that be up to the doctor to make the determination?