Minimum to be considered intermittent FMLA
Ruskanen
183 Posts
I have an employee whose father is having surgery. The employee wants to be there the day of the surgery. He may take time off after the surgery to help with recovery at home, but he may not if it's not needed. My question, if he only takes the one day, or part of the one day to be at the hospital during and after surgery, can that be considered FMLA? He is running low on unpaid and paid time off and that's why he'd like to consider this FMLA. I know that it can be considered intermittent if he is helping to care for a serious medical condition and decides to take more time off, but just for one day?
Comments
I am not positive about Kansas laws, but I do not think the state has more liberal laws than the Fed, and therefore does not require the leave to be paid above and beyond existing leave banks.
The EE can request FML, but it is up the employer to so designate. And it can happen with or without the EEs permission. The EE does not have an option here, it is the employer's option and the employer's policy, consistently enforced, as to the utilization of leave banks while on FML.
Thanks for your responses. It gets confusing when a leave must be 3 consecutive work days or longer, and/or require hospitalization, and/or ongoing treatment/care from a medical provider. I tend to be generous when granting leave (what the heck, they aren't getting paid) and luckily our employees seem to have a genuine interest in being at work. But I was wondering if only one day was worthy of granting FMLA.