Pregnancy Disability FMLA

Situation:

Company has no policies on the books and has no previous history with disability or pregnancy issues I am told. It has been around for 31 years. I have been here 5 months.


Employee who is pregnant has complications that lead to bed rest. She has used sick leave and vacation and has been told by supervisors that her job is safe - don't worry about it - if her condition improves she can come back before she has the baby, but certainly she can return after the baby's birth.

She has been out since mid-August. She hasn't been with the company for 1 year (she makes her one year on Oct. 7th) we have told her that her FMLA starts on Oct. 7th and that she was on temporary disability (unpaid leave until Oct. 7th)

For the one month until she qualified for FMLA she had to pay her 'employee' paid benefits since she was not on FMLA yet - the company pays for employee medical insurance, but not dental - she owns for one month of dental during her unpaid leave because of pregnancy complications.

I am now being asked by a company owner why she is even going to be on FMLA starting Oct. 7th since she technically on made it 10 months full with us--and never made 12 months. So we shouldn't be paying her medical insurance premiums at all. No benefits. If we consider her an employee and she is on our books and she worked up until she was put on bed rest with a medical note - isn't she employed until she quits either before or after her baby's birth?

Should we just consider her on unpaid leave until she returns after her baby's birth? If so, does that mean no FMLA even though it was explained to her she had it? What is unpaid leave? How long should this be extended?


Her supervisors have treated her all along as an employee out on with a temporary disability - and discussed extending FMLA to her once she made the 12 months. I am being told the company doesn't think she technically made her 12 months since she has been out sick with her pregnancy. So no FMLA no benefits - but she can have her job back after the baby and pick up where she left off.

HELP! Do I now call her and sorry no FMLA? Is she eligible for FMLA?

Next, a service repair tech was just involved with serious motorcycle accident last weekend. He has called in says he needs to work -can't do his regular job - because he is temporarily incapacited and can't go in the field and drive and repair. He can come in an respond to telephone service calls. He hasn't made his one year with the company either and won't until Feb. 2004...he won't be able to come in for at least a week or more and he is out of sick leave and vacation time - so he is also on unpaid leave until he returns to work. We have no obligation to him - clearly - he has been promised nothing -execpt we will try to work with him regarding another temporary position. We offer employees no disability insurance coverge to buy. So he is SOL? Unless we are able to use him in another capacity?

Comments

  • 8 Comments sorted by Votes Date Added
  • [font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 10-03-03 AT 12:33PM (CST)[/font][p]Where to begin. You work for a company that is 31 years old that has no policies. Well, it does have a policy. It is called statutory benefits. However, the company may have been ignoring the policy. Furthermore, to the best of your knowledge, it has no previous history with disability pregnancy issues. Every disability and/or pregnancy has issues, it just that some of the issues are no-brainers.
    Re your questions - You desperately need a policy. How long should some one be an employee before they get an unpaid leave of absence(especially if they are not entitled to FMLA). FMLA sets the minimum - what is company policy on how long a FMLA leave can be. I could go on and on. Whatever is decided must be administered in a uniform way. Therefore, since you seem to have no policy re unpaid leave, you may be treating the pregnant employee under different rules than the tech. You appear to have given her a limitless leave (think what happens if she has complications at the delivery) and yet you are concerned that the tech will be out for about two weeks. Doesn't seems logical. Furthermore, if you intend to do anything affecting someone who is already out on an authorized leave, you should check with an attorney.

    Finally, Texas doesn't have statutory std?




  • thanks for your reply.

    Yes I understand they must both be treated the same. However, does the pregnancy employee qualify for FMLA if she has been out on unpaid leave for 5 weeks prior because of a medical condition? Wasn't and isn't she protected un the PDA?

    I drafted an employee handbook when I arrived and provided to the aforementioned owner to review, edit and approve. It has not been returned to date.

    So, all things being said - I thought we should consult a lawyer as well - however - our comptroller and current benefits administrator thinks we just now deny FMLA to the employee and allow her to return when birth is over - as if she never left. She will be eligible for benefits again. I don't feel good about that.

  • FMLA laws discuss one year and 1250 hours of work during that year. If she was full time, she probably got the 1250 hours in, and since she has been out on leave, not terminated, and promised a position and FMLA, you are boxed in. It seems clear to me that she gets the 12 weeks starting on Oct 7.
  • I made that same arguement for 12 months and 1250 hours - she has hours - the owner is claiming she has to have both..12 months and at least 1250 hours..not one or the other?

    I think we are boxed in as well - by the law having extended her job to her upon her return.
  • Agreed, but when her FMLA is over (and if she is still disabled)is her job still open? "Promises" were made because there is no written policy.
  • Yes, it is both, however she is still working for the company, merely on LOA. That is the action that effectively extended her being with the company for 12 months. The people urging you to a written policy should not be ignored. Write the policy, train the managers, and utilize these situations (names removed of course) as real life examples so your management people get it.


  • You mentioned PDL. I am not familiar with Texas employment laws, but California does have PDL. If Texas is like us, then an employee qualifies for up to 16 weeks maternity leave immediately upon hire. Usually, PDL runs concurrently with FMLA. But, your employee does not qualify yet for FMLA, so if you have PDL then she would be on unpaid leave for PDL. This does offer job protection, but not necessarily benefit protection. If at some point during her PDL leave she qualifies for FMLA by having the 1250 hours worked in a year, then you would need to start running the FMLA calendar along with the remaining PDL.

    Elizabeth
  • I agree with Whatever that you need, deperately, some written policies in place. I would also discuss with the supervisors their right to "guarantee" an employee their job without having proper knowledge of the laww, etc. That being said, I think you are stuck with this situation in that you approved her LOA so going back at this point and telling her it's not approved would not be a good thing and a sympathetic jury would see you as the big, bad employer picking in a poor defenseless pregnant woman who has been restricted to bedrest. Best case scenario is to consider this one a done deal, address the situation in a formal, written manner with the remaining employees so that this doesn't happen again.

    As for the EE who was in a motorcycle accident, if you have a temporary job for him to do while he heals, great but don't try "making" one for him. Once you do that you will have other EEs wanting the same thing. As for the length of time to allow him off, you need to sit down with the "higher ups" to determine what is reasonable.

    One last thing, you may want to look at adding some type of STD benefit, even if it's completely employee paid. Situations like those you list (especially the accident) are unplanned and most people live paycheck to paycheck and something like this can really put them "under the gun".
Sign In or Register to comment.