Sexual Harassement
System
5,885 Posts
A situation arose where an employee made suggested comments and actions to an independent contractor. Other employees had made complaints to management about this behavior but when asked if they would be willing to file and attest to a complaint they than refused. Is it necessary that compaints be filed or can we as the em[ployer act on heresay.
Comments
What I do when I hear of problems such as yours, I perform an investigation talking to everyone who was involved in the situation or has been named as a witness. After I have the complete story, I make a decision on how to proceed. It may be discipline following our progressive disciplinary process, or it may be "fatherly" advise - depending on what actually happened.
>There doesn't have to be a "formal complaint" for your company to be
>liable for an harassment lawsuit. If word has gotten to you one way
>or another, consider it reported. Now you have an obligation to take
>action.
>
>What I do when I hear of problems such as yours, I perform an
>investigation talking to everyone who was involved in the situation or
>has been named as a witness. After I have the complete story, I make
>a decision on how to proceed. It may be discipline following our
>progressive disciplinary process, or it may be "fatherly" advise -
>depending on what actually happened.
>complaint how would I than present it to the responsible party. What
>would be my response if asked for evidence of the accusation.
>
Sorry, I didn't see this question until today. I recently dealt with a harassment charge. The "victim" told me her story and gave me the names of witnesses. This was racially motivated, not of a sexual nature. When I talked to these so-called witnesses, they disputed the claims of the victim. Instead, they said the "victim" was the one making racially charged comments which tended to make people uncomfortable. So, I dug deeper and talked to a group leader who used to give the "victim" rides to work. She stopped the taxi service primarily because of the poor attitude of this person and was tired of hearing all her complaints. She supported the testimony of the two "witnesses", but was not part of the original claim nor did she work in the exact same department.
I went back to the "victim" and told her I was unable to find anyone to support her claims, and in fact they put the blame back on her. I asked her if she could provide any other witnesses or proof. She admitted she was unable to. She also admitted that much of her claim was over a year old - it went back to the events of 9/11.
I gave further counselling to all involved to not retaliate and the ramifications of false accusations. This occured earlier this year - i check back periodically with the "victim" and she says everything is fine.
Another thing that hasn't been mentioned is that a company's PROACTIVE response by immediately handling an investigation will sometimes go a long way with the EEOC, and should.
>who do not want to file a complaint, I would advise that while they
>will not be forced to do anything they are uncomfortable with, that
>their help is needed and absolutely essential if a fair investigation
>is to be conducted. I would also point out that their job is not
>jeopardy, no matter what they do. Usually (but not always), I have
>gotten cooperation.
In our policy, part of it involves parties being cooperative in the investigative process. This may be something that you would like to consider putting into your policy.
Our training and policy addresses that it is a condition of employment for an employee to make the company aware of harassment. I also tell them that they can't tell us they've been harassed but don't do anything about it. If you do that you are setting your company up for a large judgement or settlement.