No LOA-?????
bgrimes
45 Posts
Situation: I have an employee who has been employed less than nine months. He needs to have back surgery in a few weeks. (Non-work related). Our 'Leave of Absence Policy" requires that an employee be actively employed for twelve months before they are eligible for personal leave. So....he is neither eligible for personal Leave or FMLA leave. We want to hold his job open for him, but I don't want to set a precedent for other employees to think they can take off for frivolous reasons and expect it to be okay. What do you suggest?
(We have no short-term disability either).
(We have no short-term disability either).
Comments
Back surgery is not frivolous. Are you prepared to make accomodations when he is ready to return -- part-time? job modifications? more time away from work for therapy and doctor appt's?
Take a look at your state's leave laws that may be similar to FMLA to make sure that they don't cover this employee. But most importantly review ADA and similar state law. The employee may not qualify as disabled under ADA, but since he is seeking leave on a claim of a disability, you will probably need to clear that hurdle before you say "no leave." Leave under ADA can be a reasonable accommodation if the purpose is to allow the employee to return to work so that he can perform the essential duties of the job with or without further reasonable accommodation. Of course, the employee still has to qualify under ADA toclaim a reasonable accommodaiton of a leave. Unlike FMLA, there is no "minimum employment time" requirement for ADA to be appicable to the employee.