Does it matter where the harassment takes place?
JMPhr
1 Post
I have a quick question regarding what constitutes as sexual harassment, actually WHERE (proximity) is what I'm referring to.
I actually had someone ask me this - if they witness their co-worker allegedly harassing another co-worker at their private home or at a restaurant, and that co-worker who was harassed comes in the next day or so and complains to me (HR), would I do anything about it?
I actually had someone ask me this - if they witness their co-worker allegedly harassing another co-worker at their private home or at a restaurant, and that co-worker who was harassed comes in the next day or so and complains to me (HR), would I do anything about it?
Comments
A couple of things you could do is:
(1) review your anti harassment policy with the other employee to ensure that he or she understands that workplace harassment will not be tolerated (this would not be disciplinary, merely training). I would also review the policy with the complaining employee, so that he or she understands that it applies only to workplace conduct (not to co-employees deciding to socialize);
(2) check back with the complaining employee in 2 or 3 weeks (and actually put this on your calander to make sure you don't forget), to see if there has been any other problems or if any of the harassment has occured at work.
Also, depending on the degree of harassment, you may want to take action to ensure that your employee feels safe at work. (For example, if the employee says she was assaulted or raped by the co-employee, sending these people back to work together may not be feasible).
Good Luck!!
The employer can have any policy it wants that is consistent with law and based upon business necessity that addresses off-duty conduct that impacts the job or iis detrimental to the interests of the employer. Consequently, while off-the-job acts may not be determined to be technically sexual harassment as envisioned by EEOC (and various court rulings), the employer can still address that off-the-job conduct as being improper under its policies, under the right circumstances.
Another facet of this issue that I didn't see specifically addressed above is that of determining what is truly a "work-related" function. The original question mentioned only that the potential harassment was off-premises. That doesn't mean it isn't covered by law. Many employers assume that if a function or social activity isn't an "official" company event, then they have no liability. That just isn't the case. The courts have applied the "work-related" test very liberally; I would urge you to look first and foremost at the cause or purpose of the off-premises function before trying to decide what your responsibility is.
Behavior that is not acceptable in the workplace, may be perfectly acceptable in a social setting. (for example, sexual flirtation in the workplace may be banned, but certainly is not unheard of at a party among friends [even if they happen to be co-workers]).
Also, even though most states allow employers to have workplace rules based on conduct outside of the workplace that is inconsistant with the job (Texas does), some states prohibit employers from regulating conduct outside of the workplace.
That's why, if an employee complains about conduct outside of the workplace, the facts will be critical. There have actually been cases where the employee complained that a co-worker raped her outside the workplace. Employees have also complained about being stalked by co employees outside of work. This cannot be ignored by the employer, because the employer must insure the employee's safety at work, and the behavior will definately effect the working environment. In these types of extreme cases, the employer should immediately seek out legal counsel.
However, for the more run of the mill type claim, the I still think the employer should just review the policy with the employees and follow up with the complaining employee later to ensure that nothing further has occured.