Accomodations for ADA
mikey
3 Posts
I have an engineer with Hepatitis C whose job performance has steadily declined over the past year or so. He has been given the usual reviews telling him what he must do to improve his performance and recently was put on 6 months probation unless he meets certain standards of performance. His doctor has written two notes asking our "forgiveness" for this engineer's declining performance and that the meds he is on causes this. The engineer feels we are railroading him and using this as a means to "get rid of him". He wants "accommodations" but cannot tell us what those accommodations are. I've asked him to provide us a list of the accommodations he feels he needs and we will do what we can - but that we cannot lower the standards of his job due to this situation. What else can I do and am I handling this correctly? Thanks
Comments
I have a similar situation with an employee and have been advised by our attorney to address the performance issue and that it is the employee's responsibility to ask for accomodations. If we, as employers, start making accomodations without the employee requesting them, they gain protection under ADA regardless of whether they actually have a disability.
Good luck!
Thanks again, Mikey
You've only partly engaged in the interactive process. You're correct to seek the employee's input as to possible accommodations. Have you asked the emplyee what types of work problems are arising as a result of the Hepatitis? You should do that even if the employee can't identify specific accommodations. While the employee may not exactly know what type of accommodation may be needed, the doctor may. Have you given the doctor a job description and asked for his or her input as to what accommodatioins he or she thinks would allow the employee to perform the essential duties of the job.
And you are not limited to the employee and the doctor in such an inquiry. The Job Accommodation Network in West Virginia may have some ideas; or a support organization for people with Hepatitis may be able to help.
It is true you are not required to lower job performance expectation, but you may be required to modify the way the job is done, or to allow other accommodations that will allow the employee to meet job expectations. Merely saying that the EMPLOYEE didn't come up with any suggestions that would not require you to lower the standards of performance, I don't think would convince EEOC that you satisfactorily engaged in the interactive process if it comes aknockin' because of an ADA complaint.
The best way of defending the company against allegations of failing to meet its obligations under ADA is to seek out possible accommodations; determine if they are reasonable in allowing the employee to meet pefomance expectations and then implment them if they are. If the employee then fails to meet those expctations after implementation of reasonable accommdation, your company would then be able to more clearly argue that the employee was not ADA qualified because he could not do the job successfully either with or without reasonable accommodation. Therefore discharge would be appropriate as you would do with any other documented poor performer.
But don't fall back on the position that "it's not OUR respnsibility to do anything if the employee personally cannot identify possible accommodations that wouldn't lower the standards of performance."
You may get some help on this issue from EEOC Guidance on ADA, Reasonable Accommodations and Undue Hardship.
The web address for that is [url]http://www.eeoc.gov/docs/accommodation.html[/url]
Thanks again, Mikey