Accrued Vacation Pay instead of FMLA
EvaM
1 Post
If an employee files a request to use their accrued vacation paid time off to cover their maternity leave, but refuses to sign a FMLA request for leave can we force this time as FMLA? The employee does not wish to sign the form which agrees that benefits will not accrue during the time off and that the employer may request that they repay medical insurance premiums in the event that they do not return, since these and other stipulations would not apply when an employee simply takes their earned vacation time with pay.
If the vaction time is saved by the employee to use for a planned medical reason, should we in essence penalize the employee?
If the vaction time is saved by the employee to use for a planned medical reason, should we in essence penalize the employee?
Comments
Other companies will allow employees to "bank" their PTO and take the entire 12 weeks as unpaid leave and not touch this PTO bank.
As I said, it depends upon the policy of your company. You should clearly designate this one way or the other so employees don't feel they can choose which way they want to go.
1.) Can you designate leave as FMLA against the employee's wishes? Yes, I'm pretty sure you can (though I could be wrong). Otherwise, an employee could take 12 weeks of maternity/vacation followed by another 12 weeks for a different FMLA reason, like a sick baby.
2.) Your no-benefits policy penalizes prudent employees who plan ahead. And it might violate the FMLA because it penalizes people who use PTO for FMLA compared with people who use PTO for non-FMLA reasons.
James Sokolowski
Senior Editor
M. Lee Smith Publishers
As for any scheduled payroll deductions, we continue coverage throughout FMLA with the prior written understanding of repayment arrangements for any missed scheduled deductions.
We have not designated any time off as different for purposes of accruing benefits. If you are full-time, you accrue benefits. There have been very few unpaid leave instances and in those cases, benefits continued to accrued during that time. It might be that we need to revisit this policy as we grow larger and have more instances of unpaid leave, but could that still be inviolation of FMLA, to designate unpaid leave as ineligble for accruing benefits?
Assuming that you don't have a policy, yes, you can designate medical leave as FMLA. But if you haven't treated all employees that way, you will likely have serious problems. Medical insurance benefits should continue during FMLA leave, so it seems to me that the motivation for wanting to designate this employee's leave as FMLA is invalid.
We've recently made changes to our FMLA policy to address some of these issues. Let me know if I can help.
1. We designate situations as FMLA events.
2. We require employees' accrued vacation and/or sick time to run simultaneously with FMLA time-off. It's not optional. The employee, therefore, is being paid. Since employees who are on vacation or out on sick time are being paid, they accrue sick days, vacation days and get credit for paid holidays.
3. If an employee has no accrued vacation or sick time during any part of the FMLA leave, he/she is in what we refer to as "no pay status." In no pay status, employees do not accrue vacation days or sick days. Furthermore, they do not get credit for paid holidays and no payments are made to the retirement system. Lastly, in no pay status, we bill employees for that part of the medical benefit premium that is ordinarilly deducted from the pay check. If the payment is more than 30 days late, they can be dropped from the plan though we usually give them another 30 days.
[url]www.dol.gov[/url], click on Wages and click on FMLA. The compliance guide for employers is extremely useful.
The HRHero Executive Report on "FMLA leave: A Walk through Legal Labyrinth" by Anne Williams is excellent. You can check this out on their website.
You may want to call your local Wage and Hour Office to talk to someone who can offer you relevant advice as well.
Hope these help.