Another USERRA Question

I just found out I have a full time employee hired 02/16/2005 who worked 21.5 hrs Feb 18, 19 & 20, then 14.25 hours Mar 16 & 17. She then was deployed to Afghanistan until January. We may or may not have deployment paperwork - the department is looking. She doesn't qualify for our Long Term Military Leave - that requires that she had completed her 3-month orientation period. However, can I term? And if so with or without deployment paperwork?
PS - I am going to knock heads for them not bringing this issue to me WAY before this - like when she left after only working for 36 hours in a month!
PS - I am going to knock heads for them not bringing this issue to me WAY before this - like when she left after only working for 36 hours in a month!
Comments
Looking through my resources, I can find no reference to an employee having to satisfy an employer's introductory period before protection under the Act applies - but I might just be missing it. The Act does give an out if she was hired on a temporary basis for a "brief, nonrecurrent period" and there was no reasonable expectation that the job would continue for an extended period.
Assuming she is covered under the Act, the Act specifically prohibits you from terminating for any reason other than for cause within one yar of reemployment (if the employee served mroe than 180 days); or within 180 days of reemployment if the employee served more than 30, but less than 181 days.
edit: re-reading your post, Leslie, I'm guessing that your desire to term is because of absenteeism during her Feb-March employment period? If that's the case, I think you can term based on violation of your attendance policy since the offense occurred prior to being ordered to active duty.
The benefits we provide for Long Term Military Duty go above and beyond USERRA. That's why we have qualifications for it - qualifications she didn't meet.
Are you saying I can term six months after last day worked since she worked less than 181 days? Actually she was only actively at work 5 days.
Beags, I think the department has this one so mucked up (wanted to use a different constanant at the start of that word but refrained)that terming her for attendance, or lack thereof, is pointless. It appears after she worked the initial 3 days, they let her off to go say good-by to her family before being deployed. She was supposed to be gone 2 weeks, ended up gone 4, then they let here come back to work for the final 2 days before she left...all with no paperwork.
It's not that I don't believe her, it just seems odd. Everyone else who has gone into the service has beelined to my office.
Think you're stuck with this one, Leslie. Sounds to me like she was hired with full knowledge that she was going to be deployed and the supervisor in your department just mishandled things (or mucked them up, in your words).
And I think you misread my post. If she serves on active duty for more than 30 but less than 181 days, you cannot terminate her except for cause for six months after hse returns.. If she's on active duty for more than 180 days, you can't term except for cause for a year after she returns.
I have an employee who left for her two week annual training which has now expanded into not coming back until October 3 via orders from her commanding officer. She got mad at her supervisor because he called her at home to ask her a question so she simply got her CO to write her up some expanded orders. There's not a darn thing we can do about this as long as she has orders in hand.
I go along with whatever the government sends as documentation on these folks.
Disclaimer: This message is not intended to offend or attack. It is posted as personal opinion. If you find yourself offended or uncomfortable, email me and let me know why.