theft and searches
System
5,885 Posts
As I type, an event unfolds in one of our restaurants. The manager leaves the safe full of deposites unlocked in the locked office. An employee asks for something out of the office. The manager gives EE the key and the EE goes in the office. Later the manager returns to the office to find one large deposite missing. The manager heads to the employee bathroom (used by all employees to store their personal belongings) and finds the deposit in the pocket of a jacket that the manager believes belongs to the EE he earlier allowed in the office.
What should the manager do? Was looking in the EE's jacket pocket a reasonable step?
What should the manager do? Was looking in the EE's jacket pocket a reasonable step?
Comments
This employee bathroom is recognized as the location for personal property at this restaurant.
This manager is not very smart, to leave his office vault unlocked, then to give the keys to a particular employee, who ends up with a restaurant deposit in his pocket.
If you accept this story then simply regain control over the deposit and counsel the manager on security of company property. To this ee with deposit in his pocket you need to check the ee out for "brain power". He/she is to dangerous to be around our HOGs, less on people/customers.
PORK
In accordance with our theft policy, the ee was terminated.
I do see the "bring in the authorities" argument. However, I saw that as excalating a situation.
I think there is also the argument that the employee was more likely to admit the theft to their manager who they don't want to disappoint than to an officer.
While the former employee is probably grateful that they were not arrested, they now are even more desparate financial situation. I would tighten up my money handling processes NOW and grow a third eye in the back of my head if I were the manager whose lax procedures contributed to the event.
I admire your faith in the judicial system. On the other hand, as a synic, I am sure that if the attorney did not get the "search" thrown out, the judge would let him off as a first offender, thereby the question of "have you ever been convicted of a felony?" could be answered no.
I am sorry, I guess I have been watching too much Law & Order.