Sex change employee
sunshine state
31 Posts
We are a non-profit, senior serivce org. Last fall our male case manager started sex change proceedures-name change, shots-not all operations as yet-very costly. Since the change we have had 3 clients who complained that he/she was a man is women's clothing and wanted a different case manager. When the third complaint came in we wrote a counseling memo and plan to let him/her go. We have to respect the rights of the elderly. Great employee but just doesn't make it yet as a woman-walk manners, etc. big person. Has anyone else experienced this situation? Also my boss (doesn't like him/her) said that we can not use our letterhead for a recommendation? Said that there is a law against it. Any ideas on either subject. He/she did sign a paper stating that if there was any problem with the change we would have to do what is right for the agency.
Comments
With regard to the reference letter, if he/she asks for one, I see no reason why you cannot not create one that would be completely neutral and impartial. Do not know of any law that would be involved, unless it is a FL law.
Since you have already received 3 complaints and requests for another case worker, it is time to sit down with him/her and go over the statement he/s signed. I think that they would understand.
Would it be possible to let him/her continue working for say, 2 weeks, while he/s looks for a job? It would make the termination so much easier for him/her.
Any job reference should focus solely on his work function.
The best way to accomplish this may be to offer to let him resign. Because this was discussed in advance, I'm sure he knew it would be a possibility.
Can you explain this a little more? Is this an employment contract? A statement of job duties? Why was a document created prior to the change?
In NM the State Human Rights act now covers "gender identity" as a protected class along with race, sex, etc.
PORK
Not knowing how large a client base this employee (or your company) has I will still venture to say that three clients requesting a change in case manager may not be a large percentage. It does not sit well with me that an employee undergoing a lifestyle change which must be extremely tramatic, yet continues to perform well, will be terminated or asked to resign because clients can not see the "forest for the trees". Perhaps they would rather have a "do nothing" case manager as long as outward appearances are "normal". Seems to me they are the ones who need counseling, rather than the other way around.
as a cross dresser. The ee has not had any changes except dress and shot. The ee has about
50 clients and has to see these client at least
once a year. If they have problems then the ee has to visit. The clients do not want to even talk on the phone to the ee.
One of the other posters brought up a good point about some states having laws against discrimination against these folks - "genetic pre-disposition" is one term that is used. Not protected by federal statute (yet) but check your state laws on this one.
Do your clients pay for the services you render or is it subsidized with either taxes or funding from other sources? This may also need to be factored into the situation.
With that in mind, I would suggest you walk very carefully through this issue before you make a decision you could regret later. The federal and state dollars you are receiving can require a more strict adherance to a variety of HR laws and regulations than private company counterparts that do not receive these funds. From that perspective, and signed documents aside, I would think a person well into the gender change process could easily originate a sexual preference discrimination claim that might have some merit.
I think your boss may be referencing the Gainesville rapist of a few years back. He worked for a carpet cleaning company. He would rape women after he learned the lay of their apartments, learned some intimate details and schedules, etc. The company had done a background check but had only glowing recommendations. Turned out that one of the recommendations was totally false, the prior employer of the rapist (before the carpet cleaning company) had let him go due to attacking, though not raping, a client of theirs. So the prior company was also sued because they gave a good recommendation, on company letterhead. Several legal opinions during this time were that if the company had remained silent and given just dates of employment then they couldn't have been sued.
I remember this because it changed so many of us HR folks in FL and our view on recommendations.
As to what you're really asking about, I agree with many of the others, it'd be hard to come up with a valid reason to let this person go. If he sees 50 seniors and three have complained, then does that mean the other 47 are ok with him/her? If so, then what's the problem. I bet all of us could come up with 6% of our "clients" who don't like us.
Your post states that he/she is a great employee. So without good grounds for dismissal (ie: work related misconduct or failure to perform the job duties as required), I would strongly advise you to seek legal counsel before taking any kind of action on this.
Odd and out of the norm he/she may be, but it sounds like that is the only issue that is at hand...
Just my two cents :0) Good Luck!!!