Been There Done That?---Subpoenas
bragaw
36 Posts
A question to the forum.
Our company is involved in a civil proceeding which will require the deposition of a former employee. The other side has requested his deposition. The former employee's testimony is favorable to our company and he has agreed to the company attorney being at the depostion to represent the company's interest. The former employee asked whether our company would reimburse him for his time away from his current employee. At his present job he is a salaried, executive level employee.
A subpoena has not been issued by the other side--his deposition is being requested by the other attorney through our company attorney.
What is the typical policy/procedure for this type of occurrence?
Our company is involved in a civil proceeding which will require the deposition of a former employee. The other side has requested his deposition. The former employee's testimony is favorable to our company and he has agreed to the company attorney being at the depostion to represent the company's interest. The former employee asked whether our company would reimburse him for his time away from his current employee. At his present job he is a salaried, executive level employee.
A subpoena has not been issued by the other side--his deposition is being requested by the other attorney through our company attorney.
What is the typical policy/procedure for this type of occurrence?
Comments
My $0.02 worth.
DJ The Balloonman
ee, as requested. If the information is in fact good for your attorney's case he should make sure the x-ee gets compensated, accordingly. Favorable testimony of value could be considered a consulting fee and your company could pay, if what the x-ee has to say ads value to your case!
PORK
My $0.02 worth.
DJ The Balloonman