Sick leave policies and issues
dusty moshier
12 Posts
Just suppose you know someone with a sick leave policy adopted back in 1974 that reads something like: "Each employee will receive 1 1/2 days a month for sick leave. The sick leave time is cumulative from year to year."
This is a very employee friendly employer and its employees like it there alot, so many have stayed with the company for a long time. As you can imagine, since they are loyal employees, they show up for work everyday and are rarely sick. There are several of these long time employees, but one, for example, has accumulated 2,916 hours of sick leave, or basically a year of potential time off.
This company wants to change the policy, but the issue is what can or must be done with the accumulated sick leave? This is a Kansas employer and Kansas has a Wage Payment Act that does not like forfeiture of accrued benefits.
The other issue is, how to word the new polciy to take into consideration those accumulated hours (perhaps options to cash them in at a discounted rate or to leave it alone and take the position that sick leave is available while you are an employee and you have no right to payment for it if and when you leave the company, which is pretty much what everyone believes is the policy)? I hope you can suggest other options.
Help! Dusty
This is a very employee friendly employer and its employees like it there alot, so many have stayed with the company for a long time. As you can imagine, since they are loyal employees, they show up for work everyday and are rarely sick. There are several of these long time employees, but one, for example, has accumulated 2,916 hours of sick leave, or basically a year of potential time off.
This company wants to change the policy, but the issue is what can or must be done with the accumulated sick leave? This is a Kansas employer and Kansas has a Wage Payment Act that does not like forfeiture of accrued benefits.
The other issue is, how to word the new polciy to take into consideration those accumulated hours (perhaps options to cash them in at a discounted rate or to leave it alone and take the position that sick leave is available while you are an employee and you have no right to payment for it if and when you leave the company, which is pretty much what everyone believes is the policy)? I hope you can suggest other options.
Help! Dusty
Comments
Looks to me like in your situation, somebody is required to cough up some cash.
In the "sick bank" policy, we stated that during an extended illness they would have to take 5 days of their PTO before they would be able to use their banked sick time. We also used the criteria for FMLA to establish a long term illness.
Hope this helps.