Reasonable cause drug testing

We sent an employee for a reasonable suspicion drug test. The clinic told me they would contact the employee first with the results. In Utah, what is the correct protocol/process for drug result notification? (Is there a law that states it needs to be done one certain way, or is it at the discretion of the clinic?) Notifying the employee FIRST seems strange.

Also, what guidance do you have for an employer if they do a reasonable suspcion drug test on an employee and the results are negative? (We do have an alcohol/drug policy currently in place.)

Are there any reading materials or resources you would recommend on this topic?

Comments

  • 5 Comments sorted by Votes Date Added
  • The MRO will contact the employee first because there may be questions of a personal/privacy nature they have to clarify, ie. regarding prescription drugs that have turned up in the sample. The employee will have to provide proof that they are his/her own precriptions (I ended up losing quite a number of new hires when they failed the drug test for illegally taking prescriptions drugs that were not theirs).

    After they have spoken to the employee, then you will get the call from the MRO confirming that they spoke to the employee and there was either a positive for XYZ or negative. Then its your turn to handle the issue as per your policy.

    If they are negative (and I have had reasonable cause tests that came back negative), I advise you to have the employee come see you when they first report back to work. It's a good time to clarify with them the Drug Testing/Drug Free workplace policy that you have, make sure they understand why they were sent for the test, etc etc. Turn it into an opportunity to educate the employee on the policy once again. He will want to be assured that he will not receive any discriminatory treatment based on this incident. Make sure the other managers who are aware of this do not let it turn into a gossip fest.


  • Here's the Utah law that addresses drug testing:
    [b]UT TITLE 34 CHAPTER 38 Drug and Alcohol Testing[/b]

    In scanning through the sections of the law, I didn't see anything directly related to whom the drug testing agency should contact first with the results - it does seem odd to contact the employee first if the employer is paying for the test. You might want to look through the law in more depth to answer your questions.

    If you are a subscriber to your state's Employment Law Letter, you have access to the full text of the law in the HRhero.com Subscribers Area. Here's a direct link to the law. You'll be prompted for your HRhero.com Subscriber username and password when you click the link. You can call us at 800/274-6774 if you've forgotten your username and password or if you aren't sure whether you have access.

    [url]www.hrhero.com/lc/regs/stat/505135.htm[/url]

    Christy Reeder
    Website Managing Editor
    [url]www.HRhero.com[/url]
  • It is true in our state as well that, even though the employer is paying for the test, the MRO will contact the patient/employee first to discuss possible reasons for a false positive or positive. Things that might cause results to mimmick cocaine or barbiturate results. Its really more of a confidentiality issue with the employer not knowing what meds the employee may be on. The MRO will not be distracted by claims of second hand smoke, etc. And the MRO will require positive verification on claims of prescriptions that may cause a mimmick.
  • In order to cover ourselves for making a decision or what the definition of Reasonable Suspicion is, we conducted a training session with a local rehab facility. They came in an provided training and handouts to all of our supervisors. This training made them qualified to make the reasonable suspicion decision and it gave them confidence. The cost was minimual. Their qualification has also held up in court.

  • Our policy also requires the MRO to contact the applicant/employee first when he/she has tested positive. This is for the same reasons already noted, to ascertain if there is a legal reason for the individual to have tested positive. Our managers must also have approval from the MRO on reasonable cause testing. We feel this helps limit potential liability since some of our managers might not use their best judgment.
Sign In or Register to comment.